You might have read a lot about Boston Bombings, hence I'm not getting into any of that. Instead, I'm gonna solely concentrate on the technical side of it. I'm always intrigued by the findings that goes into making a successful or a failed capture/attempt. And I dunno, somehow I have always loved Hollywood action movies and have a great respect for The USA's defense system in the name of FBI, SWAT and so on. Unlike our Indian movies, Hollywood seldom shows their defense system in bad light. Why? Because they are really effective, up-to-date, have money to spend on defense and super strong.
The pressure on the entire defense syndicate in The USA on Boston Bombings would have been hell lot, owing to the fact that it took them 3 complete days and even then they could not come up with anything concrete. But, by end of the 3rd day, they narrowed down the suspects to these immigrants from Chechnya(Russia) - Two brothers, "Tamerlan Tsarnaev", aged 26 and "Dzhokhar Tsarnaev", aged 19.
How did "Facial Recognition Technology" help FBI?
Some of you might be knowing the technology and some of you might have seen the usage of such technologies in Hollywood movies called "Facial Recognition Technology". A simple example would be - "Tagging of faces in Facebook Photos" - Mind you! Tagging is not same as Recognition, but the base concept is the same. The manhunt (fortunately, it is over now) was facilitated by surveillance coverage, amateur videos and photos on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and other social media sites. But how can someone find a suspect from a million population photographed or video taped? It is a humongous task and it is near to impossible, had it been couple of years ago. The hunt to figure two suspects out of the million faces would have taken hundreds of days, if this was done manually.
But now, it takes couple of hours, because of technologies like "facial recognition", "voice identification" and "object tracking". According to a software firm based out of The USA - "Their software can pick out parts of a face, the nose, eyes and shape of a cheek, create composites match and use the meta data. Then in what they described to be like a Google search, the software scans thousands of faces. The scans are effected according to age, gender and other category related data. They can also scan objects, for example backpacks, vehicles, etc.."
Because of being in nascent stage, this technology has its pit falls too - Facial Recognition Algorithms struggle once a person’s face is hidden by more than 20 degrees, but there are softwares that can correct hidden side up to 45 degrees. It does this by filling in the hidden side of a face by copying from the visible side. Hence, the software can do the job 'approximately' for sure. And mind you, these kind of pricey technologies are used only by the developed nations, as of now. It would be great to see the day, when India gets into such hi-fi mode, isn't it?
Here is the extra hunch - (for the action lovers):
You may argue with me as to, "How did the FBI get the lead on the 2 suspects: Yes! the software fetched their faces from the crowd, but how did they get the initial scoop on the 2 suspects?"
The answer is:
- FBI's strategy was simple, the bombings happened twice with a distance of 100 meters apart. FBI was looking for faces which were present in both the locations and narrowed down to couple of suspects. Now, should I even re-iterate that our 2 suspects were already part of that bunch?
- Secondly, they were scrutinizing for backpack wearing people in the crowd, again they got a good lead which points out to the 2 suspects.
- Last but never the least, FBI asked for public help by asking them to recognize the suspects by spreading their photos and also requested the public to share photographs/clips of these 2 suspects.There you go, public did the last bit. We all have seen the picture of the 2 suspects walking with their backpacks, but one of the audiences in the public shared the picture where both did not have their backpacks, instead were fleeing the area. Should I even explain further?
So this is how FBI/SWOT/Techies/Helpers/Onlookers/Media nailed the suspects using technology. Again, my salutes to the Mighty American Defense System & of course, to our very own technology!
Share your thoughts!
Image Courtesy: From Internet
super informative post,Pavithra..great going!!
ReplyDeleteThanks Julie!
DeleteSuperb info Pavithra.... I am always very eager to read your posts as I get to know and learn so much from it... I appreciate the effort and time you take to reach out to us with all the valuable info you have... Hats off to you dear :-)
ReplyDeleteHey thanks for the encouraging and very gracious words, Nilu! Means a lot to me.
DeleteYou know, I like a lotta things, hence kinda try to simplify the technical details and make it easier for the readers. That is my sincere attempt.
Thanks once again, Nilu.
Very interesting and informative. I too like reading such articles. Lucky that they have caught the suspects finally. You are really a techieee person. :) Worth reading who really looks for information further deep. Good Post.
ReplyDeleteThanks Dhanish!
DeleteI'm glad you liked the post. I really like the idea of getting into the base or the core of a problem - so that things become interesting, hence love analysis and research.
way to go, girl !! i really like ur writes!!! the apt post for the time. and.hey! Do feel free to drop by my new blog - pick quicks when u get the time...glad if u wud be a follower there as well.
ReplyDeleteThanks Sona!
DeleteI'm following your new blog too!
Wow Pavithra, knew you were a good cook, a great writer but now I know you are technically bright too :) What an informative post dear... Way to go.. Kudos to all your sincere efforts and input!! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks Divya!
DeleteThanks for the kind words. I like to do analysis and research on any topic and simplify the same when writing - that is my stronghold. :-)
Loved the post! Between my busy schedule I caught snippets of the incidence over the news channels but was curious to know more. If you are going to bring us world news in such detail and at our convenience the way you are going, I can safely say that I can give up watching the News. Brilliant choice of topics and great write ups Pavithra! Cant wait to see what's next:-)
ReplyDeleteAha Sonali - You just made my evening :-)
DeleteThanks for those gracious words, it really means a lot to me!! It motivates me to write better and write effectively. Will try my level best to keep up :-)
Its interesting and trilling to read through the post. Some much of facts and I must say its a subject I just know on the surface yet my knowledge has gained via this sharing of yours.
ReplyDeleteThanks Nava!
DeleteYep lotta facts and some alleged news - I just did some research and simplified the technical details - Yes, that is exactly what I like to do.
Glad you liked the post, Nava.